13 Mar
2006
13 Mar
'06
6:58 p.m.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Andrew Sly wrote:
However, this text contains the prominent statement "Copyright 1999", copied from the original printed book. Am I right in thinking this could lead to confusion?
This seems to be pretty common in the rule 6 stuff I've been clearing. I think it's confusing to have an incorrect copyright statement in the PG version even when the original book had the statement. -- Greg Weeks http://durendal.org:8080/greg/