The
two Davids maintain their own productions, which should not be messed
with. DPrice is gradually transferring his old productions into the new
structure, so there may not be too many of them left. DWidger has probably
done most of his. It may be that neither of them has anything left in
etext03.
It's
standard repost practice, and common courtesy, to maintain the credit to
the original producer. During the repost project, the only time I added my
name to the credit line was in the HTML version, if I created one. If
I didn't do an HTML version, I didn't add myself to the credit line
If a
tournamenter (silly word, since this isn't or shouldn't be a
contest) reproofs an etext03 text, and creates an HTML version of it, that
person's name will accompany the original producer's name, e.g. if something was
created by John Doe, and it's reproofed/whatever by bowerbird, who also adds an
HTML file, the new credit line will read something like "Produced by John Doe,
HTML version by bowerbird". In short, John Doe will NOT lose his credit,
and will NOT lose first credit.
Greg
to confirm/deny/clarify as needed.
al
said:
> Any done by still-current producers
> (David Price, David Widger, etc)
>
shouldn't be touched.
except i'm quite sure that's not a rule for this
tournament.
as for the 587 files in etext03, it's my understanding
that
implicit credit for moving these files to the new structure
will be
given to the whitewashers. that's correct, is it not?
surely that is
not the aim of this tournament either, is it?
or have we taken
"whitewashing" back to its original sense?
are you planning to soon charge
us to do this work for you?
-bowerbird