Thanks.  It really looks good to me.  HTML as well.
<div><br /></div>
<div>I guess my next question is does your RST conversion handle inline/block math? &nbsp;I saw in the official RST documentation they have the syntax to inline LaTeX math. &nbsp;Since I know you did that back in the day for the TEI stuff, I'm wondering if you've done that here as well? &nbsp;If so, that will erase a huge part of my concerns about RST.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>(And I apologize if I'm asking too many questions as a Johnny-Come-Lately to this RST party.)</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Josh<br /><br />
<p>On Feb 3, 2012, <strong>Marcello Perathoner</strong> &lt;<a class="parsedEmail" href="mailto:marcello@perathoner.de" target="_blank">marcello@perathoner.de</a>&gt; wrote:</p>
<div class="replyBody">
<blockquote class="email_quote" style="border-left: 2px solid #267fdb; margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 1.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 02/03/2012 09:56 PM, Joshua Hutchinson wrote:<br /><br />&gt; In the Sherlock (1661), the first story is a Scandal in Bohemia, which is the<br />&gt; broken down into three parts (I, II, III). In the text, the sections are<br />&gt; labelled JUST with roman numerals, but in the Table of Contents, this makes it<br />&gt; look like an error.<br /><br />I've limited the TOC to level 1.<br /><br /><br />&gt; PS I notice you changed all the quotes to "smart" quotes. Did you do that by<br />&gt; hand or do you have a favorite (semi-)automated method?<br /><br />I used emacs regexes and then checked the result with an automated <br />quote checker. The other file already had curly quotes.<br /><br /><br />&gt; PPS Can you get it to generate the HTML on the fly, too? I'm very curious how<br />&gt; that compares in quality.<br /><br />Done.<br /><br /><br />-- <br />Marcello Perathoner<br /><a class="parsedEmail parsedEmail" href="mailto:webmaster@gutenberg.org" target="_blank">webmaster@gutenberg.org</a><br /></blockquote>
</div>
</div>