Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
If you are interested in good HTML or PDF you must start with a sematically tagged file (these days that's mostly an XML file).
can you give and defend your definition of "good" in this case?
ditto with "semantically tagged file"?
and, if you are up to the challenge, what is your recommendation as to the route that should be taken to get a library of 14,000+ e-texts converted to the brand of x.m.l. markup you think is best?
(bonus points if you can convince all the other x.m.l. advocates that the markup version you prefer is better than the ones they prefer.)
finally, greg recently requested that people come forward with working routines to implement an x.m.l.-master methodology. are you able to answer that call? did you? if so, do let us know.
-bowerbird
-- Marcello Perathoner webmaster@gutenberg.org