>neither david nor jim seem to have done very well.
(i can't quantify their performance, since as far as
i know, neither one of them specified their source,
but it's pretty safe to say they missed some italics.)

whatever italics I missed (and I would be quite confident I missed some), BB certainly has missed the fact that I *did* reference my source.  Try going to archive.org and type in “Huckleberry Finn 1912” – there are two copies there, supposedly of the same edition, one with newer plates.  I worked from the newer plates version.

Compare to the #76 version, if you want to talk about accuracy, or lack thereof.

See: adventuresofhuck00twaiuoft