"don" == don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> writes:
don> In my own proofing the only way I can have any confidence at don> all that I'm catching all the italics is to scan through the don> entire text looking for nothing but. As soon as I start don> noticing (and marking) anything else, I start missing them. don> It also destroys my accuracy when the text already has don> italics markup in it and I must check for false positives. I agree. Especially with heavily marked-up texts, check one feature at a time. When I have already marked-up text to check the way that I prefer is to scan the images and stop whenever I find an italics, and check in the marked-up text the next occurrence of <i>. Using `grep "<i>"` instead of the text is even better. Carlo (sorry of the previous message, I was composing this one and something strange happened)