Hi Carlo, You you seem to think that it can be done. RST is extendable, so components could be added. Please do not get me wrong. I would hold LauTeX for a far better master format with two reservations. we would use the the "language" for mark-up yet not the full scope as it would not otherwise map well, second the use of custom output engines. regards Keith. Am 04.02.2012 um 19:56 schrieb Carlo Traverso:
"Keith" == Keith J Schultz <schultzk@uni-trier.de> writes:
Keith> Hi Karen, It would be better to have one master format. it Keith> actually does not matter which as basically all can be Keith> adapted to support the features need. of course then in Keith> certain instances you will not be conforming to the Keith> standard.
I rather think that we cannot use one master format, we need a few. At least, you cannot reasonably have a master format for mathematics different from LaTeX, and we don't want to exclude contributors and contributions that cannot or don't want to prepare a master file in a format that you arbitrarily like.
Carlo
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d