Am 18.10.2011 um 21:56 schrieb David Starren: [snip, snip]
You'll note that Wikipedia doesn't have a leader, and is pretty anarchic as a whole. Following the Wikipedia example would encourage PGDP to internally set better standards by consensus, not listen to one leader.
Wiki does not have a leader? O.K. no particular reader, but leaders. I know a professor, a leader in research on Dante. He had a very hard time getting the entry change because it was factually wrong. Wiki is not so anarchic as one tends to think, and for good reasons, too
Secondly, Wikipedia works by letting people work on what they want. There's quite a detail of information on various TV shows, random rock bands, minor sports stars, D&D, etc.
Yet, there will always those that consider ALL this information superfluous. Others, culturally irrelevant. Others, an important record. Others, just entertaining. regards Keith.