Hi Don, What I was saying is that I need to discuss the matter of meta data. As I am playing of implementing or suggesting particular meta data be in the master format. What is important though is if you want meta data it should be in the master format and not in some other file or data base. Naturally, there are ways to keep things hooked up, but it would complicate if there are changes to the meta data and has to be aggregated to all those versions and decide which it should be connected to! As to collecting it. That is a different matter and depends on the data you want. regards Keith. Am 09.02.2012 um 00:27 schrieb don kretz:
"Metadata" is a loaded word in this context. In particular, DP has it's own legacy set of definitions.
It's worth taking the time to explain what you think the metadata is in pretty complete and precise terms, lest you be misunderstood and differing assumptions be made particularly about the difficulty of collecting it.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Keith J. Schultz <schultzk@uni-trier.de> wrote: Hi Lee,
Well, I would go further and say that the meta data should be part of the master format.
Something I should put into ANA.
Thanx
regards