Hi BB,
Naturally, I was pointing out the obvious.
Also, the discussion was not directed at most of those
here on the list.
I tried to show Lee that he has a few misconceptions
about what an ebook really is and that it is not a printed
book and that the functionality is represented differently.
Whether I reached him is to be seen.
I was well that I was likely taxing most.
That for your patientience.
regards
Keith.
keith said:
> Jim's world is not bizarre to me.
> It is more a philosophy thing.
i understand what you're saying here, keith, i do.
but i'm not sure that you understand just exactly
how retarded the discussion is that you're having.
admittedly, i'm missing something, since i am
only reading _your_part_ of the conversation,
and not the parts "contributed" by jim and lee.
but step back for a moment and get the picture...
you're talking about the _table_of_contents_, man!
what is there to talk about? i mean it. _seriously_.
and you're saying stuff like "the t.o.c. should link to
the chapters in the e-book"... well, um, yeah. d'oh.
was there ever any doubt about that? _any_at_all_?
i'm guessing that even _jim_ agreed with that part,
albeit without ever acknowledging that you wouldn't
have had to "clear up that point" if jim hadn't _first_
said something so convoluted that you really _did_
feel a need to restate the obvious to the stupid idiot.
but, jeez, keith, if you're gonna do that, at least have
the decency to _call_ him "a stupid idiot", if only so
the rest of us know that you're still aware we are not
so dumb that you need to remind _us_ of the obvious.
otherwise, we might think you are as stupid as he is...
-bowerbird
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d