That's not the way I read it.
http://www.w3.org/2009/06/xhtml-faq.html
One of the problems is that XHTML requires "well-formed XML", and many books
simply are not structured in a rigorously well-formed way.
But in any case it seems to be the common view that it simply hasn't gained
useful traction and now it's just overhead.
Don
>
>
> Wrong. XHTML IS specified! Besides HTML is a backwater and
>
> the W3C would like it to disappear.
>
>
>