That's not the way I read it.

http://www.w3.org/2009/06/xhtml-faq.html

One of the problems is that XHTML requires "well-formed XML", and many books
simply are not structured in a rigorously well-formed way.

But in any case it seems to be the common view that it simply hasn't gained
useful traction and now it's just overhead.

Don

>
>
> Wrong. XHTML IS specified! Besides HTML is a backwater and
>
> the W3C would like it to disappear.
>
>
>