keith said:[snip, snip]
> It is good to see Rogers site is making good headway.
it _has_ made "good headway" in many important ways, yes.
in other important ways, it has failed to attract critical mass.
more importantly, one must consider "the recent developments".
Well, I was taking your description for granted, I will admit that.
> Even one of the biggest collaborative efforts on the web
> Wikipedia has "Masters" that make final decisions.
> So that idea can not be all that bad.
that's not what's happening. know what you're talking about...
because i spend a lot of time and energy to make sure that i do.
the "recent developments" are that roger has decided to pull back.
No mention on his HP, I am not in the forums.
he has posted notice of this, both at fadedpage and over at d.p.