This is very interesting viewed from both sites.<div><br></div><div>We have one spokesman for PG suggesting that, for the purposes of</div><div>increasing the rate of increasing the stock, using text at some level of</div>
<div>markup sophistication (which I seem to remember strongly featured</div><div>text but not HTML), there was some possibility of room for flexibility</div><div>(or something like that.)</div><div><br></div><div>There immediately erupted on DP two substantially differing (mis)interpretations</div>
<div>of what this might mean.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Both of them have received responses I&#39;d characterize as mostly</div><div class="gmail_quote">indifference to revulsion, with a few outliers on both sides.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Now we have a second PG spokesman, and the score here seems</div><div class="gmail_quote">to be one vote for &quot;maybe&quot; and another for &quot;hell no&quot;.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Not much basis left for discussion, but we get a lot of productive</div><div class="gmail_quote">venting done on both sides.</div></div>