Hello all. I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused about something here. PG has an offer from a teacher to annotate editions of PG classics which are already available. Greg, Jim and Andrew all seem to agree that such notes should not be included in PG. This is too bad since I would like to see such annotating. However, what about a book by O'Henry? There are two editions of this. One without notes and one with notes by Joe who posted it. I think the precident has been set to allow books with contemporary notes added. Why not just assign them a new etext number? book 17,000 for example could be a Mark Twain book with footnotes added. If this is unacceptable, why not just have a xxxxx-notes file or directory? For example: 17000.txt, 17000-h.htm, 17000-notes.txt Or, the same as above but 17000-notes/ would be a separate directory with 17000.txt that has notes added. Hopefully this is clear. Is there any reason why this can't be done? This is how page images are done, right?