greg said:
>   This is, more or less, exactly what I said we needed. 
>   There is no resistance to any of this.

then why haven't you put it into place?


>   I even asked for input on figuring out what the
>   requirements & enforcement would look like.

jim has pointed out examples of problematic .html.

many times.

so have i.

simply remove those negatives.

if you would rather have positive examples instead,
examine my z.m.l. test-suite, and how it is handled.

***

i must add, however, that even though you say that
"there is no resistance to any of this," it certainly
_seems_ like your whitewashers couldn't care less
(as evidenced by that "update" to huck finn), and
to describe marcello as anything less than "hostile"
would be an injustice to truth, not to mention that
the fine people over at d.p. will impasse your ass...

so i think that puts you in over your head, greg...

and yes, i do remember that you are rather tall.
still, over your head.  though perhaps you could
call up your sled-dogs to pull you out to safety...

but how good are they at writing code?  and docs?

-bowerbird