On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Greg Weeks
<greg@durendal.org> wrote:
I don't think any of my posts are getting to gutvol-d any more.
The version for this is The Annotated Frankenstein which used microfilm scans, but didn't keep the pagination. I'd love to get the scans posted too.
I also have a clean 1831 edition I'm working on.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Robert Cicconetti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:22:33PM +0000, Jon Hurst wrote:
> The other day I noticed that DP has recently uploaded a
reworking of
> Frankenstein (#41445), the 12th most downloaded "work" on PG.
I am
> assuming that it wasn't cross-checked against #84, so I've
started the
> process of doing this.
>
> I've done the quick and easy bit and now have the text
rewrapped to
> the images. I would like to get these files uploaded to
#41445's
> fileset - they are sitting at:
>
> https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein
>
> If you want to just get a zip file rather than use git use:
>
> https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein/archive/master.zip
>
> I'm not sure what the protocol for doing this is, beyond it
being
> "supported and encouraged" to have the scans present in the
fileset of
> a given "expression" -- Greg, please let me know what you
would like
> to do.
You're saying you have the page scans that were used to make
#41445, but they were not provided as part of the original
file upload?
Usually, scans come from whoever submitted the rest of the book.
The only trick is there is a naming convention for the filenames.
Did you already do that (sorry, I did not look at the files
mentioned above)? There is a page at www.pgdp.net (somewhere)
that describes the naming convention. I have it somewhere, too.
If so, just get in touch with the WWer who posted the files, to
arrange delivery. If you don't know who this is, or none of this
makes sense, email me directly or email pgww@lists.pglaf.org
Thanks!
The page images are from a "photo-reprint" of the 1818 Lacking, Hughes, et
al. edition, which, judging by the scans, is code for microfiche/microfilm.
They're at DP for now, and when archived will end up at OLS.
http://www.pgdp.net/c/project.php?id=projectID508470307d6dd
Weren't there discussions at some point on automated or semi-automated
uploading of DP scansets to PG? They all get archived, even the ones that
aren't publicly displayed at OLS because of politeness/permission issues.
-R C
Greg Weeks
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "durendal.org80" claiming to be http://durendal.org:8080/greg/