ok now, remember how i said that preprocessing is a _simple_ thing,
typically with no need for a large set of checks that need to be done?

on the current chunk of text i'm analyzing from rfrank's experiment,
it looks like a dozen simple checks would've found 75% of the errors,
right off the bat, with no need for a word-by-word proofing round...

save the time and energy and _focus_ of your proofers:  preprocess.

-bowerbird