jon said:
But what resolution?
their website tells you. in a $10,000 machine, it better be good.
There's a web site somewhere giving a review of the model you describe, but don't have the URL handy.
we don't need a review on a website, as there's plenty of d.p. people here who'll vouch it's an amazing machine.
Yes, that is true. There is a lot of interest in DP to redo a lot of the pre-DP classics in the PG corpus, from what I understand, so it may get done anyway even if PG does not encourage it.
you didn't read what i wrote. it is _distributed_proofreaders_ that -- as a whole -- is more interested in doing new books than re-doing old ones. if they wanted to do it before now, they would have. but they haven't... (a few of 'em have redone old books. including some html versions that jim recently asked them to fix up. but as a course of action, not much.) michael doesn't tell d.p. what to do. he doesn't tell _anyone_ what to do. even if you _ask_ him for guidance, he's usually too stubborn to give it. -bowerbird