On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org> wrote:

> Having some sort of checklist, policy, data flow, etc. that can
> help guide producers and also policy enforcement would be very
> helpful.  This would clearly need to go beyond our current policy,
> which is basically that (a) HTML or RST or TEI should be submitted
> as a master, and (b) producers should use http://epubmaker.pglaf.org
> to make sure derivatives work well.

Some may remember that several months ago Greg generously provided
access to a PG server to put up a demonstration of the WordPress-based
ebook workflow tools I'm using for my site (eb.tbicl.org) where I'm hosting
the Encyclopaedia Britannica projects DP has been producing for several
years.

A couple days ago I posted some similar thoughts as just a blog post,
and proposing to try to describe a highest-level conceptual workflow,
as a framework for locating the different parts of the process, and
discussing how they connect together (or not.) As much a personal
exercise as anything, but it's there to took at and make suggestions
as I go. It's not a short-term deal; I'll try to identify and even incorporate
parts of the process on the server as a way to discuss feasibility.

Don