marcello said:
You said it was Open Source.
my open-source effort failed to attract any programmers. so it's dead in the water. (oh, and here's a hint, marcello: if you see me issuing a _press_release_, it's likely a joke, as i make fun of people who think "spin" is doing something. if it's a pro-x.m.l. press release to boot, you can be certain.) but yeah, no programmers = no open-source program... however, jon noring's open-source project is still alive -- http://www.openreader.org -- and i can assure you that that one is _not_ a put-on. (which doesn't mean it will eventually succeed either.) so i would encourage any interested people to join that. i'm guessing jon would welcome programmers _warmly_. meanwhile, my own individual viewer-program is fine! did i mention that i'm now getting the beta-test going? you can subscribe! zml_talk-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Or are you going back on that?
many open-source proposals never get off the ground. just a fact of life. thanks for your interest, however. but now i must get back to the discussion in progress... -bowerbird p.s. i'm not "soooo sensitive", as you put it. if name-calling _is_ condoned on this list -- i still haven't got an answer -- then that's just _fine_ with me, because there are a couple tarking naugshlocks that i'd be happy to call names... :+) you see, i am able to maintain a _sense_of_humor_ in this. i just want to make sure that i understand the ground-rules...