jim said:
>   Perhaps there is such a thing as a "stupid answer" since
>   the answer you gave recently addresses none of the issues I raised.

i was quite clear that i was deliberately not answering your questions,
precisely because they were stupid, and -- even further -- because
their answers were contained in the example i'd given just previously.

i'll work very hard, and go far out of my way, to have a good dialog.
because i value that.  which is the same reason i won't countenance
someone polluting that dialog with posts that regress the progress.

i've spent years refining my filenaming conventions.  you spent
5 minutes and came up with some kindergarten-level questions.
use another 5 minutes, and you can answer your own questions.

maybe then you'll also know why i would rather spend 10 minutes
of my own time writing _this_ post instead of 5 minutes writing
a post that answered your stupid questions.

-bowerbird