Why not create PG forums?

On 5/17/05, Jonathan Ingram <jonathan_ingram@yahoo.com> wrote:

--- Joshua Hutchinson <joshua@hutchinson.net> wrote:
> ... snip ...
>
> I agree wholeheartedly with David.  The topics under discussion have almost
> never been the problem.  It is the person(s) involved in the discussions that
> has been the problem.  Remove the problem, not the discussions.
>
> And we do need to have a wide range of topics.  For instance, I'm working on
> TEI, which I think is of vital importance to the future of PG (some may
> disagree).  Discussions of TEI lead naturally into discussions of Unicode,
> graphic image formats, CSS, and other markup formats.

There are quite a few of us who would find it interesting to talk about these
topics on gutvol-d if we knew that it wouldn't descend into pointless
mudslinging within a day. I personally know of at least five DP volunteers who
no longer follow gutvol-d because of the tone of recent posts.

--
Jon Ingram


__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d



--
Joseph R. Gruber
joseph.gruber@gmail.com