Hi All, Well, back in the Plain Vanilla days, if I remember correctly: 1 No. 2 Yes. 3 No Because the text was done differently. Furthermore, correction to a particular version was made to that version and a new revision was released. Today, the situation is somewhat more complex as the amount of information – formatting is greater. So 2, would be the way to go, also. Yet, if one just corrected the original submission( no idea how that could be done) then just a revision bump should be done. As to the credit line, just use corrections submitted by e.g BB. This would not imply a direct interaction between the original submitter and the corrector. regards Keith. Am 18.11.2012 um 20:30 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:
moreover, i have created a clean version of the same edition that jim used. so imagine that i am going to submit it to p.g., along with the pagescans, to create a better overall package...
this is the question for jim.
what should p.g. do with my submission?
1. reject it.
2. put it under a new number.
3. accept it, and overwrite jim's edition with mine, complete with a new credit-line mentioning "a volunteer", but no name. (i would not take a joint credit-line, because that might imply we'd worked together; and likely neither would jim, probably. it would be acceptable to me if the credit-line got _deleted_.) jim's flawed version could be stored in the "old" subdirectory, because hey, nobody ever looks inside those anyway, do they?
anyone else is invited to chip in their opinion as well, but i am especially interested in jim's thoughts. and, if he makes a post before thanksgiving, i will consider it in my deliberations about whether or not, after thanksgiving weekend, i will indeed make a submission to p.g. of a corrected edition of jim's "huck finn".