That's real good news, Greg, especially if you're talking about flexibility on
the DP side. 100% of the responsibility for evaluating and recommending
changes to the DP process has been apparently relegated to the DP Board
of Directors.

Since you are one of the five directors, you're in the know if anyone is. Since
you represent 20% of the horsepower responsible for coming up with those
changes, I trust you've been busy.



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:33:01PM -0800, Jim Adcock wrote:
> ...
> If PG were able to easily accept a txt file now and the html version (and
> other versions later) not only would readers get some books a year earlier,
> but we could probably save some efforts that die and get lost somewhere
> between txt complete and html complete. Why does posting have to happen "all
> at once" ???

It doesn't.  In fact, "extracting" works from DP earlier was a big push
I made a couple of years ago.  At that time, such two stage (or other
great-than-one stage) output was something that didn't fit well with
the workflow.  Maybe that's something that could be revisited.

It's important to not double the effort involved at the final posting
phase (whitewashing) through such a two stage process.  But there are
several good ways of insuring this, which could be incorporated with
the process.

There is definitely flexibility.

 -- Greg
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d