re: Re: [gutvol-d] re: poofing and tarking

anne said:

I don't know why it was spurned, but I do know that he's posted a lot of stuff that is still in copyright and sooner or later lawyers are going to eat his lunch. As long as nobody could figure out who owned the copyright, that was okay, but now that courts have ruled on the owner, it's another matter.

i don't know anything about that. i'm very supportive of people who will have the guts to publish something and take a chance at being dragged into court, if they are making that thing _available_ when it was an orphan out of circulation. but again, i don't know about blackmask, so i don't know if that applies, or not... -bowerbird