More on wikisource editor:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:VisualEditorSandbox">http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:VisualEditorSandbox</a> </div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Visual_editor/Features">http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Visual_editor/Features</a> </div>
<div><br></div><div>This is only slighlly peripherally interesting:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Product_Whitepaper#Framework_for_Strategic_Product_Analysis">http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Product_Whitepaper#Framework_for_Strategic_Product_Analysis</a> </div>
<div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:40 AM, don kretz <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dakretz@gmail.com">dakretz@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This one is interesting for a couple reasons.<div><br></div><div>The are providing at least some PG work in this format - there is an</div><div>Encyclopedia Britannica project that starts with PG (from DP) work..</div><div>

<br></div><div>They are building in some form of semantic structure:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica" target="_blank">http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica</a> </div>

<div><br></div><div>They recently displayed a prototype of a new markup-less editing</div><div>interface. (But that&#39;s not it.)</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Jimmy O&#39;Regan <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:joregan@gmail.com" target="_blank">joregan@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 27 January 2012 07:58, Greg Newby &lt;<a href="mailto:gbnewby@pglaf.org" target="_blank">gbnewby@pglaf.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>


&gt; A third (new) type would be those files that are, in some way,<br>
&gt; modified, derived, or produced by other people and their tools.  Not<br>
&gt; necessarily WWers or the original producers/submitters.  In a word,<br>
&gt; crowdsourcing.  Or community editing.  Or version control.  Or<br>
&gt; whatever you want to call it: the point would be that ANYONE with<br>
&gt; desire and some basic capability could make changes to existing files,<br>
&gt; or provide derivative files.<br>
<br>
</div>Like on Wikisource?<br>
<a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:A_Desk-Book_of_Errors_in_English.djvu" target="_blank">http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:A_Desk-Book_of_Errors_in_English.djvu</a><br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
&lt;Sefam&gt; Are any of the mentors around?<br>
&lt;jimregan&gt; yes, they&#39;re the ones trolling you<br>
</font></span><div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
gutvol-d mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org" target="_blank">gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d" target="_blank">http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>