Lee>it would appear that his experience in trying to be an individual contributor to Project Gutenberg has been an endless stream of "you have no value" messages. Let me be clear that *I* know the contributions I make: The last book I submitted to PG had over 6500+ corrections I found over that which is posted at IA. And when PG refused to support EPUB and MOBI some years ago I created a little website to support MOBI users which still draws 200,000 downloads a month, 400,000 at Xmas time, in spite of the fact that I have tried to point those users back to PG. Maybe because the books I posted there actually "work" ? My latest set of "tirades" started when a submission that tested "clean" on my end of the submission process "crapped out" at the PG end of the process, so I sent email to PG saying "okay help me out here, tell me what tools where you are ***actually*** using to test the submission on your end of the process so that I can check it out on my end and see what is going wrong" and the WW'er responded "positively" to me by simply telling me that there was no way in hell he was going to accept my submission. Thanks for the help. PG has since accepted the work and it is drawing about 650 downloads a month. Conversely, PG has one well-known text which has been downloaded millions of times which still contains about 1500 errors. Why?