Keith> You have not refuted the fact that PG is responsible for any particular format. PG does offer formats for reading, just like any good repository should. A good repository offers multiple formats well-formatted and representative of the original book for reading on the devices that real-world customers want to read on. A goal which PG and most other "repositories" fail at once they start seeing themselves as "repositories" and not as active sources of real books for real people to actually read. Keith> That is not the purpose of PG. PG is there to preserve books and offer them to those willing to read. "Willingness to read" depends on the flavor of the dog-food. When a non-profit loses a charismatic leader there is often an upheaval where the organization takes a look at itself and asks "what is our mission?" Now seems to be PG's turn. Keith> Is that the fault of PG or someone else. You could just refactor the CSS. and VOILA. Yes we could just refactor the CSS, and HTML5 and CSS3 provides the tools to do most of what we need to do cleanly and simply. Yet it is not happening at PG. Why not? Because the people who are in the position to in practice allow this to happen are instead blocking it from happening so that they can pursue their own agenda.