"Jim" == Jim Adcock <jimad@msn.com> writes:
Jim> Seems like the problem could be solved if the HTML coder Jim> assigned any residual rights to the HTML code to the US Jim> Government for example. Or if the HTML coder agreed Jim> explicitly that it is a work for hire. Or, whatever. Surely not. This might be OK for US law, but surely would not be OK for citizens of other countries, whose laws do not allow implicit transfer of copyright and in which copyright cannot be lost. And I or many other people would strongly object to transfer any right to any government, but especially to US government. The only solution might be a publication with a different licence, for example one of the variants of Creative Commons, modified to introduce some of PG peculiarities. Carlo