It may take me a little while, but I'm happy to try and answer any questions you have about bookloupe...
 
Ali.
 
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015, at 06:30 PM, James Adcock wrote:

Huh.  Not obvious to me what he is doing in bookloupe.


Jim.


From: gutvol-d [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] On Behalf Of Al Haines
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:37 PM
To: 'Project Gutenberg Volunteer Discussion'; 'James Adcock'
Subject: Re: [gutvol-d] Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck


I'd like to give it a try.  Can you upload it somewhere?  Or you can send me a copy as a zipped attachment. 


And if you can mention the etext numbers of several of the files you tested it against, I can cross-check them with Gutcheck and Bookloupe (http://www.juiblex.co.uk/pgdp/bookloupe/index.html).



Al




-----Original Message-----
From: gutvol-d [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] On Behalf Of James Adcock
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:49 PM
To: gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
Subject: [gutvol-d] Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck

I’ve created a Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck, calling it gutcheck_u -- if anyone wants to try it.


This was primarily an exercise in finding and changing 8-bit char coding dependencies to 16-bit widechar coding dependencies, but it did require some additional coding.


Currently it is a somewhat Windows-dependent implementation, so if you want to run it on another OS it would take a little bit of work.


I find it more pleasant to use if one’s development file format of choice is UTF-8, and/or if one are doing such things as left-handed / right-handed quotes.


Testing it on PG released files I am in fact finding a fair amount of left / right handedness errors that are not currently being discovered.


Let me know if you want to try it, same distribution terms as the original.


Jim Adcock

jimad@msn.com

_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d