The various "frankNN.txt" versions ended with frank15.txt. To my knowledge, PG never had a published "version 16", i.e. a file named frank16.txt. When I reposted frank15.txt into the post10K structure in 2008, I made a copy of it named frank16.txt strictly as a local working file. That frank16.txt file, and the frank16.htm file I generated from it, were then processed by PG's posting software to create the published 84.txt and 84-h.htm fileset. If there's another frank16.txt file out there somewhere, it didn't come from me.
-----Original Message----- From: gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Passey Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:50 PM To: gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org Subject: Re: [gutvol-d] Frankenstein
On 11/28/2012 1:15 PM, Al Haines wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:38:23AM -0700, Lee Passey wrote:
This is great information. Can the list be made searchable, so if I have only the e-text number I can find the associated posting (or reposting) message?
Posting notes are archived by month/year. They're ordered by the date in which they were sent by the WWers, which is more or less in numerical order. There are two exceptions: when etext numbers are reserved for future use and when an old, pre10K, etext is reposted.
When a pre10K etext is reposted, its repost note appears in the month in which the reposting WWer sent the repost note.
Reservations occur when numbers are prerequested, usually by DP, for a multi-volume set with cross-links. Such reserved numbers may not actually get used/posted for some time, i.e. they might be requested in June, but not actually be submitted/posted until several months later, depending on how long it takes to post-process the various volumes of the set. Posting notes for reserved numbers will appear in the month of posting, not the month of request.
A beautiful example of a non sequitur. The question was not "how is the list archive structured?" the question was "can it be made searchable so messages involving a specific e-text number can be found?" Of course I can download the zip file for every month of each of the past 3 years (apparently the limit of the archive), extract each file from the gzip/tar, and then grep for the number, but a web-based interface would be more user friendly.
When a work is reposted, is the prior version retained for historical purposes?
Yes. Etext #84 is a typical example.
Great. Can you point me to version 16 which existed in 2007, and which is a (the?) precursor to the current version? Were there other versions between 16 and the current version?
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol> -d