Gutcheck/Jeebies/Gutspell don't work well on UTF8 files. I ran the reports on the generated 1-8.txt Latin1 file. Agreed, the bulk of the reported items are legitimate, but 18 actual problems are more than sufficient to make it worthwhile. I also ran Gutspell on 1-8.txt, but didn't feel like browsing its 3000+-line report. As mentioned on the upload page (http://upload.pglaf.org/), Gutcheck is a required pre-upload check, and by extension, so are Jeebies and Gutspell. A word to the wise... -----Original Message----- From: gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] On Behalf Of James Simmons Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:11 AM To: Project Gutenberg Volunteer Discussion Subject: Re: [gutvol-d] Bhagavata Purana ready to submit? Al, I should probably run gutcheck and jeebies on the generated text file rather than the RST file. Some of the spaced punctuation is legitimate. My problem with this book is that there are so many odd names that finding genuine errors in the middle of the reported errors is a challenge. James Simmons On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Al Haines <ajhaines@shaw.ca> wrote: When I ran Gutcheck on 1-8.txt, it flagged 10 items that I think need attention--spaced quotes, wrongspaced quotes, extra periods, spaced punctuation, etc., etc. Jeebies flagged 8 he/be errors. Al -----Original Message----- From: gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] On Behalf Of James Simmons Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 5:17 PM To: Project Gutenberg Volunteer Discussion Subject: Re: [gutvol-d] Bhagavata Purana ready to submit? OK, I think I have something just about ready to submit. I'm going to read through the MOBI on my Kindle before turning it over to the whitewashwers, but I'm still interested in any comment from you all. The latest stuff is here: http://epubmaker.pglaf.org/cache/20120408081709/ Thanks, James Simmons On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:51 PM, James Simmons <nicestep@gmail.com> wrote: Marcello, That works all right, but the asterisks are not replaced with spaces when the <i> tags are put in so it throws the alignment of the ASCII art off. If I fix it it will no doubt screw up the plain text version. I'm going to keep fooling with it until I get something usable. Thanks, James Simmons On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Marcello Perathoner <marcello@perathoner.de> wrote: On 04/07/2012 09:39 PM, James Simmons wrote: James, I agree with you entirely, but RST does not give me a way to do it. If you specify :: you get a set of<pre> tags and absolutely everything within them is passed through as is. I had to change '*' to '_' to get the underscores in there. The text actually says that wives names are in asterisks, so if I simply left the underscores out I'd remove information from the file. I did the best that RST allows me to do. You could use the parsed-literal directive: http://docutils.sourceforge. <http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#parsed-l iteral-block> net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#parsed-literal-block -- Marcello Perathoner webmaster@gutenberg.org _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/ <http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d> mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d