Michael Hart <hart@pglaf.org> writes:
However, my most recent research, in conjunctions with the head of error correction at a major publisher, leads me to think 1/3 of errors might be found per pass, instead of the previous 1/2.
What a about a proper case study? I'd say you would better give up on talking about numbers ;) If you are interested in catching errors, print it out and read a paper copy. Or even better, if you are interested in 1:1 accuracy between the original and the copy, let one loud-read(?) the text with all diacritical marks while a second person looks at the text of the copy. -- http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o | _-\_<, | (*)/'(*) Key fingerprint = F138 B28F B7ED E0AC 1AB4 AA7F C90A 35C3 E9D0 5D1C