Oh come ON bb, mind your antecedents unless you are posing as a
troll or paranoid!!
No matter how solipsistically you think, you know damwell not
everyone in this forum is the same person saying the same things to
the same proddings.
when i suggest that
p.g. should beat the harvesters to the punch
by selling p.g. e-books at amazon, it's "self-indulgent inbox
clutter".
You have produced plenty of that stuff among all the rest in this
exchange. A lot of the other guys have indulged you. The topic was
chewed to rags in earlier exchanges, without achieving anything that
I noticed (if anyone noticed any achievement more impressive than to
convince you that everyone was out to GET you, I missed it, but
please don't bother to bring it to my ever-aghast attention. ) By
mingling pointlessly with the husks you have qualified for the title
along with the worst of them.
when linda suggests the same thing, it's "the most practical
response".
Linda got to the point; she stuck to the point till she had made the
point. Then she stopped. She was was logical, trenchant and might
yet prove effective. Notice any distinctions between that and
various of her correspondents' contributions?
bless your little heart, jon... :+)
And your little bb... <siiigh>
it's all moot anyway, because google is about ready to blow
the doors
off the joint... they've just announced that google editions
will go live
"before christmas", and they have well over 30,000 e-texts, my
friends.
yeah, yeah, your accuracy is better. and betamax was better
than vhs.
Yeah, yeah...! Now what next, if anything?
Go well,
Jon