In a message dated 11/21/2004 2:07:20 AM Mountain Standard Time,
traverso@dm.unipi.it writes:
>>Here too you are assuming that other people use
the
>>same tools that you use. A good tool is one that adapts
>>itself to an
>>unknown situation, and does not make
assumptions. >>Discarding page
>>numbers in reference works
makes assumptions on >>other people's working
>methods; the result
is a less flexible tool.
I didn't assume. I asked. Some ISPs carry formatting over and some don't. I
have no idea what ISP someone I don't know is using or what that ISP might
do with formatting.
A good tool is one that can be used for at least 50 things besides the one
it is designed for. You can use two bricks to kill a fly, if you can figure out
how to make the fly stay on the bottom brick long enough for you to clap the top
brick on top of it. You can use bricks and boards to make a bookcase. You can
make a street out of bricks. Go away and think of 47 other uses for bricks. Then
talk to me about tools.
I am not recommending discarding page numbers in reference books. I am
suggesting that the majority of books already posted do not necessitate going
back and redoing to insert the page numbers.
It's like those old Tom Swift books I was recently accused of reading in
preference to anything else: if I want to do a learned paper or book on the
Stratemeyer syndicate--I think but am not sure, and it is not necessary for
anybody to inform me, that it included Tom Swift; I know it included Nancy Drew
and the Hardy Boys--I will have to go somewhere that I can use the tree book
versions, and even then I'll have to be careful, because I know that Nancy Drew
and the Hardy Boys were rewritten umpteen times, often with no more than the
title saved from edition to edition and no indication in the front matter as to
what version this one was.
But do enough people want to write learned papers on Tom Swift, or Tarzan,
or Elsie Dinsmore, or The Wizard of Oz, for it to be reasonable for me to demand
that all the Tom Swift, Tarzan, Elsie Dinsmore, and Wizard of Oz
books to be pulled down until somebody has time to rescan them and keep
all the page numbers this time?
I don't think so.
By the way, since so many people seem to know better than I do what I'm
reading at present, I'll save them the trouble of guessing. I have finally laid
my hands on a copy of Isabella Beeton's 1865 book on household
management--University of Adelaide has posted it--and I'm reading it because I
think that it is appropriate Sabbath Day reading, and yes I know different
religions have different "Sabbath Days" but I'm referring to my own religion's.
(I specify this because I was once head of a very small--three
person--department which happened to include a Muslim, a Christian, and a fellow
who wasn't interested in religion. So I set schedules up so that I was always
off Sunday, which I wanted, and Saki was always off Saturday, which he wanted,
and Pat was always off in the middle of the week, which he wanted. So my boss's
boss turned it all around so that none of us had the days off we wanted, because
I could not get it through his head that we were all happy with the schedule I
had arranged.) I stopped reading the book long enough to send a message to my
brothers inquiring how to slice a garfish and how many axes would be necessary.
Mrs. Beeton gives instructions for how to cook the garfish but she begins by
saying that it is necessary to begin by slicing the garfish. Last time (okay,
the only time) I ever saw a garfish, one of my brothers tried to behead it and
broke an axe.
By the way, Mrs. Beeton does not number pages. She numbers recipes. So her
table of contents and her index get a reader to the right place no matter what
form the text is in. Three cheers for Mrs. Beeton!
The previous book was Pamela; the next ones will be A. Merritt's The Moon
Pool and The Metal Monster. I'm perfectly furious that one of the A. Merritt
books I've been seeking has turned up on FictionWise and I have to PAY for it
and I don't have the money.
Shall I report on what books I read after The Metal Monster? Actually I was
kind of thinking about calling a whole lot of state capitals and explaining that
we need to redo our registrations and asking how I need to go about doing it,
but if it's necessary for me to give book reports I can do that instead. Also
I'm sort of busy reading ancient Egyptian medical books in preparation for a
novel I'm writing that includes Luke the Physician, but I couldn't get them
online because the English versions are still in copyright and I can't read
hieroglyphics, which doesn't matter because they aren't on line in
hieroglyphics either, so I had to get them through ILL.
What have I ever done to you to make you want to bite my head off every
time I post? I can't help being autistic. I was born autistic. You can help
being a walking, talking, grouch box.
Anne