7 Mar
2005
7 Mar
'05
8:54 a.m.
Usually, it's cheaper and easier to use a bigger database server then try to redirect the requests to another site. The only time you'd want to redirect to another site would be in the event the primary site was down. Disclaimer: I'm a sysadmin at a hosting company. -brandon Dave Fawthrop wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:28:42 -0500, D Garcia <donovan@abs.net> wrote:
| On Sunday 06 March 2005 01:57 pm, Marcello Perathoner wrote: | > The PG site is just too popular. The database cannot serve more than ~30 | > requests at one time. | I don't think there's any such thing as PG being too popular. :)
Agreed. Is there no way of transferring requests which cannot be handled to a mirror site? Cheaper than a bigger server?