>>  Enforcing "no HTML" in mailman mailing lists

>> is easy, just an option in the content filters

>> section. 

Bowerbird wrote:

> i will support a "no html" policy here...

> ...if we enforce it on the library as well!

> whaddya say, guys?  can we work a deal?

> you don't really wanna be hypocrites, do you?

ONE USE  of HTML (in emails) makes it harder for multiple people.

ANOTHER USE  of HTML (in PG books) greatly improves the readability for multiple people.  

A raw text format would be cool-- as I've argued in the past-- much cooler than the TXT80 format, with the 80 columns.  That PG's TXT isn't true raw text is why we need to go to/ keep  HTML. Some might be able to write a program that does it, but it sets up a barrier to easy reading access of the books.