Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
i haven't "implemented" even one of your suggestions; any changes i made are ones i always intended to make.
... said the fox and went away.
you've commented on my first two alice versions. would you like me to comment on _your_ first two? the ones that go back to 2003? i can, if you want.
Yes, please do! By all means! Make people know I already had a working pdf by the time you first announced your vapourware reader.
and let me remind people that i never did go back and fully critique your _current_ .pdf, due to its "pimples". there are a number of other comments i could make...
I'm shaking in my shoes ... but go ahead!
well, most typographers aren't concerned about "widow words". even the typographers who do care about "widow words" won't laugh in your face if you haven't controlled for them. the mandate simply is not that great.
Typographers are an obliging species. They only care for exactly what *you* want them to care for.
that it actually does a very accurate job. do you see any errors?
Plenty. The first paragraph after each picture should not be indented.
that is indeed the prevailing convention. it is also one that i have never agreed with,
Those naughty typographers! They did decide on something without asking you! -- Marcello Perathoner webmaster@gutenberg.org