How do you conclude I propose going back to anything?


On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:53 PM, David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:
> In terms of order-of-magnitude scalable growth, though, DP, for all its
> other benefits, is more like the problem than the solution. So new and
> different procedures need to be considered, not to replace DP, but to give
> more options to people who don't fit the DP work pattern.

You're complaining about scalable growth, and you propose that we go
back to ways that didn't scale? I don't object to making the PG
website more helpful, but no matter what you do for solitary
producers, if they're ever a major supply of works for PG again, it
will be because PG is dying.

--
Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d