jimmy said:
>   they did quite a lot of work to bring the engine itself up
>   to modern standards, and have been relatively successful

jimmy, that's fantastic news!

i myself don't do too much scanning, not books
-- more interested in _birthing_ digital-books --
but the people over at d.p. will love to hear this...

they've really tried to use tesseract in the past
-- and i mean they truly _wanted_ it to work! --
but it just didn't perform at the level required...

so they keep using finereader.

(and, for anyone out there wondering about it,
no, they don't use the o.c.r. from archive.org...
even when archive.org stuff isn't fatally flawed,
the d.p. people have found they can usually get
better results from their own scanning efforts.
don't know why that's true, but it's interesting.)

so i hope d.p. people from here spread the word.

(they usually erect a big cone of silence around
this listserve, because they don't want the people
from over there to know about me, or hear me...
they banned me over there, where i'm now known
as he-who-cannot-be-named, a.k.a., voldemart.)


>   It got a huge shot in the arm
>   when the Android guys took notice

ok, that makes sense.

because i've definitely noticed that it's now being
incorporated even at the level of apps these days.

and i must be honest that one thing which i had
never anticipated is how it would be paired with
_translation_ software, for some _killer_ synergy.

my word!

those apps, where you point your phone at a sign
and it is translated in real-time, are stupendous!

and when you think how they could be improved
with some crowd-sourcing and mechanical-turk,
the realm of possibilities gets truly staggering!


>   is due to be released around Thanksgiving?
>   I'm not American, so I only have a vague idea
>   of when that is :)

the 4th thursday in november.  4 weeks from today.

-bowerbird