So you are saying that wikileaks publication of US diplomatic
wires are of interest to PG ! 
That the US is trying to do something about it  is of interest about that fact
is of interest to PG.

C'Mon ! Quote all you want out of context. The facts remain.

Yes, PG is interested in public domain books.
Free internet, free speech, ...

I never knew though PG is an activist group!

Forget it. I am not interested in your political opinions which only have the o
so slightest bearing on PG and its objectives. To say actually, none at all.

regards
Keith.

 
Am 08.12.2010 um 01:07 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:

keith said:
>  
I do understand the dynamics.

then why did you ask?


>   Yet, how wikiLeaks and their
>   latest revelations are of concern
>   to PG is beyond me. 

then why did you say you understand the dynamics?


>   Please do not even reply.  I do not really care.

ok, you don't care.  fine.  i _do_ care.  so i will reply.


>   Do you think I expect an answer!

is that a question?


>   You do know what a rhetorical question is.

is that a statement?