So you are saying that wikileaks publication of US diplomaticwires are of interest to PG !
That the US is trying to do something about it is of interest about that fact
is of interest to PG.
C'Mon ! Quote all you want out of context. The facts remain.
Yes, PG is interested in public domain books.
Free internet, free speech, ...
I never knew though PG is an activist group!
Forget it. I am not interested in your political opinions which only have the o
so slightest bearing on PG and its objectives. To say actually, none at all.
regards
Keith.
keith said:
> I do understand the dynamics.
then why did you ask?
> Yet, how wikiLeaks and their
> latest revelations are of concern
> to PG is beyond me.
then why did you say you understand the dynamics?
> Please do not even reply. I do not really care.
ok, you don't care. fine. i _do_ care. so i will reply.
> Do you think I expect an answer!
is that a question?
> You do know what a rhetorical question is.
is that a statement?