Hi BB, I honestly, thought that you were serious about creating a useful tool, but I must sadly admit you are not and agree with some of the critic to your so called collaboration. BB said: actually, i don't give a flying freak, not in the slightest, for any testing and feedback i might receive from here. perhaps you didn't hear, but i have been offering to collaborate for 7 years now, and have had no takers, and didn't expect one now either, but if jana wants to jump in, then i'm more than amused to entertain us all. It is very sad. A very poor joke. It, also shows that you have no real interest in helping the PG community in any way. Nor due do you have any respect for the PG cause! Truely, sad. Sorry, no regards Keith. Am 23.02.2011 um 09:48 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:
keith said:
Then, you have a design flaw in the logical sense. If it is purely a converter tool to produce an end product, then there should be no last minute editing to do!
that might be the case if this tool was only used at the very end.
but i expect some authors will choose to use it every single day, so they can review their latest draft in their handheld machines.
makes it feel more "like a book", instead of a work-in-progress.
-bowerbird _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d