jim said:
>   Not sure what part of the elephant you've grabbed hold of,
>   but if you looked at the example in question it would be
>   obvious that your answer isn't.

do you really think i'm going to let myself get wrestled into
having a discussion with the blind men about the elephant?

if so, think again.

i said as much as i can in support of you -- you're half-right.
so is lee...  if you want to figure out the specifics from there,
you're welcome to do so.  but you'll be doing that without me.

-bowerbird