On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:25 PM,
<Bowerbird@aol.com> wrote:
don said:
> Assume PG has the images.
if p.g. has the images, odds are that
the text doesn't need to be corrected.
(it certainly wouldn't be cost-efficient;
few of us object to the final 50 errors.)
plus you already have the provenance.
so that's a _totally_ different situation.
i mean, you might care about such cases.
but i can't imagine that many people will.
so there's no volunteers to work with you.
-bowerbird
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d