If,t any point in your process, you decide it's valuable to consider what the text is, as compared to what it looks like from point to point, then it might comprise some amount of additional work. OTOH, if you begin to suspect that the structure of the document will help you construct a better product, then I think the idenfication of sentences and quotations leads to a fair number of validation opportunities that can be automated to provide exceptions to inspect with good chances for improvement. Once you have those, curling the quotes is cake.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:08 PM, David Starner
<prosfilaes@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ideally it would be the reader's choice, not the producer's choice.
That doesn't make any sense. They're still curly quotes, even if the
font used to render them is straight. And they're not done, because
they're not cheap to do; there's always some cost in going the extra
step, and I think there's a valid question here about whether it's
worth it.
--
Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.