On 1/20/2012 10:32 PM, Jim Adcock wrote:
Anyone who is evaluating the quality of the ePubs produced by the PG tool would be well advised to learn the ePub and XHTML specifications, unzip the subject ePub and examine the markup by hand. There's simply too much variation among User Agents to be able to come to any valid conclusion any other way.
Let us remember that you are defending a pile of weirdness that PG is generating from one and/or another PG tool.
I can't see anything in my post that could possibly be construed as "defending" this stinky, steaming pile of ... What I /said/ was that when you're evaluating the quality of an ePub you need to look at its contents, not its behavior in any given User Agent. Which is apparently just what you did this second time.