Unless, of course, it is intended that you not know, and you should assume

it's a black box and what it does and how it does it isn't anything you should

count on in the future. Which is a legitimate approach; but it should be

made explicit.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:57 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:

One shouldn't need to examine the source code to anyone's program to

find out what it does. Which could be something else entirely tomorrow.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:53 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:

Some of the Publish-On-Demand services recommend you do exactly

that. And their requirements are quite similar.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jim Adcock <jimad@msn.com> wrote:

>If I would follow your way of arguing things lets all just take one of the
most widely used formats on the planet docx!

Actually a better idea than most floated here.

_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d

_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d