20 Mar
2006
20 Mar
'06
7:40 p.m.
scott said:
And, even if income tax is involved, that's hardly a show stopper. I would guess the ad revenue would easily cover the tax rate and an accountant.
why would p.g. want to go into the ad-selling business? isn't the internet permeated enough with sales pitches? even "thank you" notes for donors smells "fishy" to me... where _precisely_ is it you expect the proceeds would go? i think michael hart should be the #1 recipient, but i suspect he'd rather go without pay to have his project remain pure... indeed, isn't that pretty much what he just said?... -bowerbird