8 Dec
2010
8 Dec
'10
7:13 p.m.
In Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Jim Adcock <jimad@msn.com> wrote:
*Can* PG redistribute such a work "for pay", and/or add their own headers which include the PG terms for redistribution?
Sufficiently complex HTML is copyrightable, thought whether any PG HTML reaches that level is questionable. However, anyone PPing for PG knows what they're getting into; whether legally they could object or not, it would strike me as a sleezy thing to do. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.