27 Jan
2012
27 Jan
'12
6:40 p.m.
My concern would that when "the crowd" finds "real" problems in a PG text, such as remaining scannos, or coding of txt70 or html files which clearly falls nowhere near close to current PG standards, then there needs to be a well-sanctioned way to fold these "real fixes of real bugs" back into the "official" PG source code. Otherwise the crowdsourced stuff, while it may be better than what PG "officially" provides, simply continues to spin out of control. You've got to have a way to "merge back" eventually that which gets learned, fixed and improved by the crowd.